reMYnd + AiCarer — How We Win
reMYnd + AiCarer
Commercialisation Playbook
How We Win

We are the only program that monetises both sides of the dementia equation at once.

A step by step plan to take reMYnd and AiCarer to Bupa, the Medibank Group, Queensland Health and the Commonwealth. Built to be provocative enough to open the door, and defensible enough to survive a health economist on the other side of the table.

Audience  Insurer and government decision makers Prepared for  Naomi Ferstera, Founder Partner  AiCarer (signed MOU)
The winning idea, in one sentence

Every other prevention program sells one side of the ledger. We sell both: the carer who costs money today, and the at risk adult who will cost a fortune tomorrow. The carer gets an insurer to yes this year. Prevention gets government to fund the scale.

Start here

The burning platform

Four numbers that make the problem impossible to ignore, and impossible to solve by paying for more of the same.

$4.7bspent directly on dementia in one year, and the AIHW calls this an underestimateAIHW, 2022 to 23
$77.9breplacement value of unpaid care already propping up the systemDeloitte, 2020
44%lower dementia prevalence by 2050 if onset is delayed five yearsJorm et al., 2005
2×a carer is roughly twice as likely to rate their own health as fair or poorAIHW; Carers Aust.
The wedge

Why we win where others stall

The asymmetry no one else is using

The carer is present tense. Prevention is future tense. We need both, and we have both.

Pure prevention programs ask a buyer to bet on a payoff fifteen to twenty years away. That is a hard sell to an insurer whose members churn every few years, and a slow sell to a government on a three year cycle. So prevention programs stall.

The carer changes the maths. A dementia carer is an identifiable, high risk, under served member who generates claims this year. Improve their sleep, their cardiorespiratory fitness, their HRV, their mood, and you reduce a cost the buyer can see inside twelve months. That is the wedge that gets the first cheque written. Prevention then rides in as the upside, not the whole bet.

The door Maintain Your Brain left open

The closest Australian analogue to reMYnd told the market it could not commercialise itself.

Maintain Your Brain (MYB) is the world's largest online dementia prevention trial, more than 6,000 Australians, run out of UNSW. Its 2025 cost effectiveness analysis found the program was effectively cost neutral while significantly improving cognition and lowering dementia risk. Costs over three years were almost identical between groups (about $16,473 versus $16,521 per person), with better outcomes in the intervention arm. ESTABLISHED AUSTRALIAN

The researchers then said, in print, that despite being effective, scalable and cost effective, attracting government or commercial interest to deliver it at population scale had "proved challenging." That is the gap we walk through. We are not trying to invent the science. We are the commercial vehicle MYB never built, with two things it did not have: a wearable data stream and a carer.

The money map

Who pays, and who benefits

Every pitch has to answer one question before any other: how does the person across the table make or save money. Here it is on one page.

Time horizonWhat changesWho pays nowWho benefitsThe lever reMYnd + AiCarer pulls
Near term
0 to 24 months
Carer health improves: sleep, HRV, fitness, mood, distress Insurers, via avoidable carer admissions and chronic disease onset Insurers and employers first A measurable twelve month carer intervention with a claims signal
Medium term
2 to 10 years
Slower progression, fewer crisis admissions, later institutionalisation State health and aged care systems Queensland Health, Commonwealth Earlier risk reduction in the at risk midlife cohort
Long term
10 years plus
Dementia onset delayed across a population The whole system, $26b plus by 2041 Commonwealth, society A delay of even one to two years moves billions per year
The policy backbone

We are the delivery mechanism for the government's own plan

The National Dementia Action Plan 2024 to 2034 is the Commonwealth's ten year roadmap, endorsed by every Health Minister. It is not a funding program, it is legitimacy and direction. And it puts our headline number in the government's own mouth.

Their number, not ours

The Action Plan states, in its own words, that if it can drive as little as a 5 per cent annual reduction in new dementia cases in people aged 65 and over, it could result in up to $120.4 billion in savings by 2056. We are not a vendor asserting a saving. We are a delivery mechanism for a figure the Commonwealth has already committed to in writing. ESTABLISHED AUSTRALIAN

reMYnd and AiCarer map onto the Plan's own actions

The Plan has eight actions. We sit squarely inside three, and support two more.

Action Plan actionWhat the Plan says it wantsWhat we deliver
Action 3
Delay onset and progression
"People at risk of developing dementia often aren't supported to take preventive action." Midlife (45 to 65) named as the key risk window.reMYnd core. A structured, measured, twelve month multidomain program for exactly that midlife window.
Action 6
Support carers
"Carer burnout can lead to people living with dementia entering permanent residential care earlier than needed." Carers "could also benefit from physical activity to improve their physical and mental health."AiCarer core. Proactive, continuous carer support and measurement, not respite as a last resort.
Action 8
Data, research, innovation
"No single dataset", "Australian data is limited", "innovative practices and models often aren't translated into practice." AI named as an opportunity, with ethical safeguards.A consented, wearable linked longitudinal dataset, and a translation engine. Directly answers a stated national data gap.
Action 2
Awareness (supporting)
Educate people on risk factors and ways to reduce risk.The Healthy Ageing Project, a trusted community channel already doing this at scale.
Action 4
Post diagnosis (supporting)
KPI: "increased number of people with a chronic disease management plan in place with their GP."A structured program a GP can wrap a chronic disease management plan around.

Where we actually get in

The Plan has no chequebook. These are the funded and structural doors it points to.

  • The MRFF Dementia, Ageing and Aged Care Mission. The Plan names it as the fund for "evidence based models, tools and pathways that enable earlier detection" and "innovative therapies and technologies." This is where MYB+ was funded. It is the money tap.
  • MBS chronic disease management. The Plan flags aligning dementia with chronic condition management and sets a GP chronic disease management plan KPI. This reinforces the same Health Management pathway insurers can use. VERIFY the exact mechanism
  • The annual Dashboard and the mid-point review. The mid-point review will "consider new developments in dementia research, technology or supports and how these could be incorporated." That is a literal insertion point to become a recognised delivery vehicle. We time evidence to it.
  • Strategy alignment. The Plan ties to the National Preventive Health Strategy 2021 to 2030 and the National Strategic Framework for Chronic Conditions. Citing these signals we are inside the tent, not knocking on it.

Map our outcomes onto their scoreboard

The Plan publishes a public dashboard of "how will we know if we've made a difference" measures. We report in their language.

What reMYnd + AiCarer measuresThe Action Plan measure it feeds
Cardiorespiratory fitness, cognition, metabolic and risk scores over twelve monthsRisk reduction and delayed onset and progression (Action 3)
Carer sleep, HRV, distress, quality of life, and healthcare utilisationCarer wellbeing and sustainability of the care relationship (Action 6)
Consented longitudinal cohort data with anonymous participant codesImproved dementia data and evidence translation (Action 8)
Members with a GP chronic disease management planThe Action 4 chronic disease management KPI
The three plays

How we approach each buyer

Same program, three different doors. We never use the same pitch twice. Each buyer hears the layer that pays them.

1
Private health insurersBupa, and the Medibank Group (which owns ahm)
They care about
Hospital claims, member retention, chronic disease management, and corporate or employer wellbeing contracts. Both groups are publicly repositioning from "paying for healthcare" to influencing outcomes earlier, Bupa with Blua and connected care, Medibank with Live Better and Amplar Health. You are pushing on an open door. PLAUSIBLE
The hook
The carer is your most under served high cost member. Around half of carers report high or very high psychological distress, and roughly twice the rate of fair or poor health. Fund their recovery and you reduce claims you are already absorbing blind.
The proof
MYB cost neutrality with better cognition. The cardiovascular to dementia cost bridge: people 65 plus with CVD carry an incremental dementia burden of $6.45b (stroke) to $17.57b (myocardial infarction) over remaining life, which ties prevention straight into the risk pool insurers already price. Plus an Australian health coaching precedent that returned up to $9.89 per $1. ESTABLISHED AUSTRALIAN
The honest flag
Bupa's own rigorous trial (CAPICHe) found no significant one year cost difference from health coaching. We raise this first, not them. It is why our deal is structured around measurement, not a promise.
Regulatory note
Private health insurers cannot fund general prevention freely. The likely pathway is a Health Management or Chronic Disease Management Program under the Private Health Insurance rules. VERIFY Confirm the exact pathway with a PHI compliance adviser before proposing the funding mechanism.
The single ask
A co designed twelve month carer pilot, run on your de identified claims data, with one pre agreed primary outcome: change in carer healthcare utilisation versus matched non carers. You bring the data linkage. We bring the program and the science.
2
Queensland HealthState system, regional equity, hospital avoidance
They care about
Avoidable hospitalisations, the aged care interface, and regional and rural equity. Queensland is one of the steepest growth states for dementia. AUSTRALIAN
The hook
Queensland's dementia burden is projected to climb around 91 per cent, from roughly 88,200 today to 168,300 by 2054. You cannot build your way out of that with beds. The only lever that bends the curve is delaying onset and keeping carers functional and out of crisis.
The proof
A five year delay in onset cuts national prevalence 44 per cent by 2050 (Jorm et al., 2005). A two year delay is modelled at a 14 per cent saving, around $4b per year by 2040 (Vickland et al., 2011, same research group as MYB). Carer support that delays institutionalisation has US trial evidence of roughly 1.5 years later nursing home entry. ESTABLISHED AUS US proxy on placement
The reach angle
The Healthy Ageing Project gives reMYnd an organic, trusted channel into exactly the regional and midlife Queenslanders the public system struggles to reach early. That is a distribution asset a department cannot easily build.
The single ask
An outcomes based regional pilot, co invested, measuring carer crisis presentations and at risk cohort risk scores, with a clear pathway to departmental endorsement if the signal holds.
3
The Commonwealth and the MRFFNational scale, the policy tailwind
They care about
Delivering the National Dementia Action Plan 2024 to 2034, which every Health Minister endorsed, and getting value from the MRFF dementia and ageing investment. AUSTRALIAN
The hook
The Plan already commits, in writing, to the number we deliver: a 5 per cent annual cut in new cases could save up to $120.4 billion by 2056. reMYnd sits inside Action 3, AiCarer inside Action 6, and our dataset inside Action 8. We are not asking government to back a hypothesis. We are offering to deliver its own plan.
The precedent
In June 2026 the government funded Maintain Your Brain Plus through the MRFF to scale digital dementia prevention nationally, ages 45 to 79, with a rural focus and AI personalisation. The appetite is funded and on the record.
The position
We do not compete with MYB+. We mirror its cost effectiveness evaluation so results are comparable and publishable, and we offer what a grant funded academic program structurally cannot: a commercial engine, a carer product, and a longitudinal data asset built to outlast a grant cycle. We time our evidence to the Plan's mid-point review.
The integrity line
45 per cent of dementia cases are linked to fourteen modifiable risk factors across the lifespan (Lancet Commission, 2024). We frame this as upper bound potential, never as a guaranteed reduction. A scientifically trained reviewer will trust you more for saying so.
The single ask
Grant co funding or a formal alignment and data partnership that positions reMYnd + AiCarer as the commercial translation pathway for scalable digital prevention.
The sequence

The step by step play

You do not win this in one meeting. You win it by arming the asset, landing the wedge, proving the signal, then scaling the contract. In that order.

Now, before any meeting

Arm the asset

Lock the evidence dossier (this is built). Secure the data and IP portability clause in the definitive agreement with AiCarer so the dataset stays a clean, sellable asset even though it co mingles with their infrastructure. Confirm the HREC protocol carries the wearable data stream. Get a one page scoping letter from a health economist, Griffith University's Centre for Applied Health Economics is the natural and proximate partner.

Output: a fundable, defensible package and a protected data asset before anyone sees a slide.
1
Months 0 to 3

Land the wedge

One warm introduction to a single insurer's health services or innovation team, not the sales team. Lead with the carer cohort, not with dementia prevention. Offer a pilot that costs them almost nothing to scope because it runs on their existing data. Your goal in this phase is not a contract. It is a yes to designing the pilot.

Output: one insurer agrees to co design a carer pilot.
2
Months 3 to 9

Prove the signal, and build the moat

Run the carer micro study and the claims linkage. This generates the single number nobody in Australia currently has: the health system cost of carer ill health, and carer utilisation versus matched non carers. Whoever produces that number first owns the most cited datapoint in the category.

Output: a proprietary, publishable Australian figure that no competitor and no government program currently holds.
3
Months 9 to 18

Scale the contract

Convert the pilot into an outcomes based or shared savings contract with a pre agreed benchmark. Run the Queensland Health and Commonwealth conversations in parallel now that you have a signal, not a hypothesis. Align the evaluation with MYB+ so results compound rather than compete.

Output: a value based contract plus a parallel government pathway.
The horizon

The asset that sells

Insurer contracts, government endorsement, and a protected longitudinal dataset are not three wins. They are one compounding asset. Together they are what makes reMYnd acquirable, which is the exit the program was built for.

Output: a defensible, contracted, data rich asset with a clear buyer logic.
The proof stack

Every claim, with its receipt

This is the table you hand the sceptic. Australian data leads. Where it does not exist, the proxy is labelled, never disguised.

ESTABLISHED PLAUSIBLE VERIFY AUSTRALIAN UK / US PROXY
Claim we makeThe numberSourceFlags
Direct dementia spend, one year$4.7b (an underestimate)AIHW, 2022 to 23EST AUS
Five year onset delay cuts prevalence44% lower by 2050Jorm, Dear & Burgess, 2005EST AUS
Two year onset delay saves per year14%, about $4b by 2040Vickland et al., 2011EST AUS
5% incidence cut saves by 2056$120.4b cumulativeNATSEM / Brown et al., 2017EST AUS
Digital multidomain program is cost neutral with better cognitionabout $467 / person difference, not significant; GCC z +0.18MYB CEA, Welberry et al., 2025EST AUS
Unpaid care replacement value$77.9b per yearDeloitte Access Economics, 2020EST AUS
CVD attributable dementia burden$6.45b to $17.57b over remaining lifeGao, Nguyen & Moodie, 2022EST AUS
Queensland prevalence growth to 2054+91%, 88,200 to 168,300Dementia Australia / AIHW, 2023EST AUS
Modifiable risk factors, lifespan45% linked, 14 factorsLancet Commission, 2024EST  upper bound
Health coaching ROI precedentup to $9.89 per $1Hafiz et al. review, 2021PLAUS AUS
Carer support delays placementabout 1.5 years laterMittelman et al. RCT (verify)PLAUS US
Five year delay, national cost and prevalenceabout 40% lower cost, 41% lower prevalenceZissimopoulos et al., 2015EST US
Unpaid care exceeds the health budget£162b vs £156b NHSCarers UK, 2023 (no stable link, verify)EST UK
Intellectual honesty

What we do not yet know

A scientifically trained audience trusts the person who names the gap. Each gap below is also a reason for the pilot. We turn every weakness into the rationale for the next phase.

Gap 1

No Australian dollar figure for carer burnout

There is no published Australian study putting a dollar cost on the health system impact of carer ill health. We will not fabricate one. The closest verified figure is that 42 per cent of carers struggle to access affordable health services.

How we close it: the Phase 2 claims linkage produces this number, and we own it.
Gap 2

No carer to claims link in Australia

No Australian study connects carer burden to private health insurance claims. The mechanism is well evidenced overseas. The Australian dollar attribution is missing.

How we close it: this is precisely what the insurer pilot is designed to measure.
Gap 3

Cost neutral is not yet cost saving

MYB demonstrated cost neutrality with better outcomes over three years, not net cash savings. The long horizon savings are modelled, not yet observed.

How we frame it: better outcomes at no extra cost is already a winning profile. Savings is the upside we test, not the claim we lead with.
Watch

Borrowed effect sizes

reMYnd's expected effects are drawn from FINGER and MYB. They are not yet measured in our own cohort.

How we handle it: we propose to measure reMYnd's cohort, never to assert another trial's numbers as our own.
The sceptic in the room

What they will throw at you, and the answer

This is just another wellness app.
No. A wellness app reports steps. We measure cardiorespiratory fitness, cognition, sleep, metabolic markers, HRV and quality of life at baseline and longitudinally, against validated change detection thresholds. This is a measurable health outcomes platform with a research grade assessment battery.
MYB showed cost neutral, not cost saving.
Correct, and we say so first. Better cognition and lower dementia risk at no additional cost is already a strong health economic result. We are not claiming savings yet. We are claiming a measurable carer signal on top.
Your effect sizes are borrowed from other trials.
Yes. reMYnd is built on the FINGER and MYB model deliberately. We are proposing to measure our own cohort, not to pass off their numbers as ours. That is the difference between a vendor and a researcher.
There is no Australian carer cost number.
Also correct. That is the gap, and it is the opportunity. We will generate it with you, on your data, and it becomes a publishable asset for both of us.
Regulation limits what we can fund as an insurer.
Understood. The pathway is a Health Management or Chronic Disease Management Program under the Private Health Insurance rules. We are bringing a PHI compliance adviser to structure the mechanism correctly rather than guessing at it.
Self selected, healthy volunteer cohorts overstate the effect.
A fair critique of the survey data. The pilot is designed with matched comparison and claims linkage precisely to control for it, which is why we lead with a measurement design, not a marketing claim.
The unfair advantage

Why this founder, and why now

Credibility is the cheapest distribution you will ever have.

reMYnd is led by an Accredited Exercise Physiologist, Exercise Scientist and Nutritionist with 27 years of clinical experience, and a University of Queensland PhD candidate researching exercise and cognition in older adults. The science is not outsourced. It is the founder.

The Healthy Ageing Project, a free community approaching 20,000 members, is a trusted organic channel into exactly the midlife and regional Australians the system struggles to reach early. The strongest legitimacy lever for sceptical or editor run rooms is simple: we can put decision makers in front of the researchers directly.

And the motivation is real. The founder's mother lived with mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease. This is a category built by someone who has been the carer.

The system is already paying for dementia and carer breakdown. The only question on the table is whether it keeps paying after the crisis, or starts paying before it. We are the only program built to be paid for the second one.

Verify in one place

Sources and links

Every figure in this report, grouped so you can click straight through. Australian sources first, then proxies, then the items flagged for verification.

Australian, core economic case
  1. AIHW, Dementia in Australia, spending. $4.7b direct spend, 2022 to 23. aihw.gov.au
  2. Jorm, Dear & Burgess, 2005. Five year onset delay cuts prevalence 44% by 2050. PubMed 16343295
  3. Vickland et al., 2011, BMC Public Health. Two year delay, 14% saving, about $4b per year by 2040. PMC3198946
  4. NATSEM / Brown et al., 2017. Economic Cost of Dementia in Australia 2016 to 2056, $120.4b saving from a 5% incidence cut. Dementia Australia PDF
  5. Gao, Nguyen & Moodie, 2022. CVD attributable dementia burden, $6.45b to $17.57b. PubMed 35094992
  6. Dementia Australia, facts and figures. Queensland prevalence growth to 2054. dementia.org.au
Australian, the reMYnd analogue and prevention
  1. Welberry et al., 2025, MYB cost effectiveness analysis. Cost neutral with better cognition. ScienceDirect
  2. UNSW, June 2026. Maintain Your Brain Plus national scale up grant. unsw.edu.au
  3. Lancet Commission, 2024. 45% linked to 14 modifiable risk factors across the lifespan. thelancet.com
Australian, carers and insurer economics
  1. Deloitte Access Economics, 2020. Unpaid care replacement value $77.9b. deloitte.com
  2. AIHW, Informal carers. Carer health worse than non carers, 17% vs 46% good or excellent health. aihw.gov.au
  3. Carers NSW, 2024 National Carer Survey. 54% high or very high distress, access to care difficulties. carersnsw.org.au
  4. Hafiz et al., 2021, BMC Public Health. Health coaching ROI up to $9.89 per $1. PMC8582197
  5. CAPICHe study protocol. Bupa health coaching trial, the cautionary Australian precedent. PMC3306732
Government policy and funding pathways
  1. National Dementia Action Plan 2024 to 2034. Australian Government, Department of Health and Aged Care. The $120.4b saving figure, the 8 actions, the carer and risk reduction language. Your uploaded copy; published on health.gov.au, confirm the live link before citing.
  2. MRFF Dementia, Ageing and Aged Care Mission. The funding tap the Plan points to. health.gov.au
  3. National Centre for Monitoring Dementia, AIHW. Home of the Action Plan dashboard and the Dementia in Australia data. aihw.gov.au
UK and US proxies
  1. Zissimopoulos et al., 2015 (US). Five year delay, about 40% lower cost, 41% lower prevalence. USC Schaeffer
  2. Mittelman et al. RCT (US). Carer support delays nursing home placement about 1.5 years. Verify: PubMed search
  3. Carers UK / University of Sheffield, 2023. Unpaid care worth £162b, exceeds the NHS England budget. No stable deep link, confirm on the Carers UK site before public citation.

Scope and integrity. Australian data is prioritised throughout. UK and US figures are used only as proxies where Australian data does not exist, and are labelled as such. Items tagged VERIFY require external confirmation before public citation, specifically: the exact Private Health Insurance funding pathway, the Zissimopoulos per person savings figure against the primary text, and current Queensland Health dementia expenditure from the AIHW state tables. Effect sizes for reMYnd are drawn from analogous trials and are not yet measured in the reMYnd cohort. The 45 per cent modifiable figure is a theoretical population attributable fraction framed as upper bound potential, not a guaranteed reduction. reMYnd is a commercial prevention program and is distinct from any academic research program.

reMYnd by Naomi Ferstera  |  in partnership with AiCarer  |  hello@remynd.com.au  |  remynd.com.au